研究论文

GB1与金属离子相互作用的NMR研究

  • 成凯 ,
  • 姚陈叠 ,
  • 徐国华 ,
  • 李从刚
展开
  • 1. 波谱与原子分子物理国家重点实验室, 武汉磁共振中心(中国科学院 武汉物理与数学研究所), 湖北 武汉 430071;
    2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期: 2017-04-23

  网络出版日期: 2018-03-05

基金资助

The national natural science foundation of China (21575156, 21505152).

Interaction of GB1 with Metal Ions Studied by NMR Spectroscopy

  • CHENG Kai ,
  • YAO Chen-die ,
  • XU Guo-hua ,
  • LI Cong-gang
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan(Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Wuhan 430071, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2017-04-23

  Online published: 2018-03-05

Supported by

The national natural science foundation of China (21575156, 21505152).

摘要

G群链球菌G蛋白的B1结构域——GB1蛋白,常被用作发展体外及体内基于顺磁核磁共振(NMR)的蛋白质结构测定方法的研究模型.为确保赝接触化学位移(PCS)、顺磁弛豫增强(PRE)等顺磁约束数据的准确性,了解GB1和金属离子,尤其是顺磁离子的相互作用非常必要.然而GB1和二价金属离子以及镧系金属离子的相互作用并不十分清楚.本文利用NMR波谱研究了GB1和镧系金属离子以及多种二价金属离子的相互作用.我们发现GB1和镧系金属离子之间存在弱特异性相互作用,和Mn2+、Cu2+以及Co2+等顺磁二价离子弱结合,但不与Ca2+、Mg2+以及Zn2+等抗磁二价离子结合.该研究表明在GB1上链接顺磁探针时,应使用与固有位点结合常数差异明显的顺磁标签以获取正确的PRE数据.

本文引用格式

成凯 , 姚陈叠 , 徐国华 , 李从刚 . GB1与金属离子相互作用的NMR研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2018 , 35(1) : 1 -7 . DOI: 10.11938/cjmr20172575

Abstract

B1 domain of staphylococcal protein G (GB1) is a widely used model protein for developing in vivo and in vitro protein structural determination methods based on paramagnetic nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) such as pseudocontact chemical shift (PCS) and paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE). However, few previous studies have investigated the interactions between GB1 and metal ions, especially paramagnetic ions. In this study, the interactions between GB1 and divalent/lanthanide metal ions were studied by NMR spectroscopy. It was found that GB1 weakly bound with paramagnetic lanthanide ions and paramagnetic divalent ions, including Cu2+, Mn2+ and Co2+. In contrast, GB1 did not bind with diamagnetic divalent ions, such as Ca2+, Mg2+ and Zn2+. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that there were two binding sites for Cu2+ in GB1, but only one for lanthanide ions and divalent ions Mn2+ and Co2+. The current study demonstrated that NMR spectroscopy is a powerful tool to study weak binding between protein and metal ions. And the results indicated that care must be taken to avoid possible interference to paramagnetic NMR data when using GB1 as the model protein.

参考文献

[1] GRONENBORN A M, FILPULA D R, ESSIG N Z, et al. A novel, highly stable fold of the immunoglobulin binding domain of streptococcal protein G[J]. Science, 1991, 253(5020):657-661.[2] NADAUD P S, HELMUS J J, HOFER N, et al. Long-range structural restraints in spin-labeled proteins probed by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2007, 129(24):7502-7503.[3] NADAUD P S, HELMUS J J, KALL S L, et al. Paramagnetic ions enable tuning of nuclear relaxation rates and provide long-range structural restraints in solid-state NMR of proteins[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2009, 131(23):8108-8120.[4] NADAUD P S, SENGUPTA I, HELMUS J J, et al. Evaluation of the influence of intermolecular electron-nucleus couplings and intrinsic metal binding sites on the measurement of <sup>15</sup>N longitudinal paramagnetic relaxation enhancements in proteins by solid-state NMR[J]. J Biomol NMR, 2011, 51(3):293-302.[5] SENGUPTA I, NADAUD P S, HELMUS J J, et al. Protein fold determined by paramagnetic magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy[J]. Nat Chem, 2012, 4(5):410-417.[6] SENGUPTA I, NADAUD P S, JARONIEC C P. Protein structure determination with paramagnetic solid-state NMR spectroscopy[J]. Acc Chem Res, 2013, 46(9):2117-2126.[7] LI J P, PILLA K B, LI Q F, et al. Magic angle spinning NMR structure determination of proteins from pseudocontact shifts[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2013, 135(22):8294-8303.[8] SENGUPTA I, GAO M, ARACHCHIGE R J, et al. Protein structural studies by paramagnetic solid-state NMR spectroscopy aided by a compact cyclen-type Cu(Ⅱ) binding tag[J]. J Biomol NMR, 2015, 61(1):1-6.[9] TAMAKI H, EGAWA A, KIDO K, et al. Structure determination of uniformly <sup>13</sup>C, <sup>15</sup>N labeled protein using qualitative distance restraints from MAS solid-state <sup>13</sup>C-NMR observed paramagnetic relaxation enhancement[J]. J Biomol NMR, 2016, 64(1):87-101.[10] MUNTENER T, HAUSSINGER D, SELENKO P, et al. In-cell protein structures from 2D NMR experiments[J]. J Phys Chem Lett, 2016, 7(14):2821-2825.[11] PAN B B, YANG F, YE Y S, et al. 3D structure determination of a protein in living cells using paramagnetic NMR spectroscopy[J]. Chem Commun, 2016, 52(67):10237-10240.[12] SEEWALD M J, PICHUMANI K, STOWELL C, et al. The role of backbone conformational heat capacity in protein stability:temperature dependent dynamics of the B1 domain of Streptococcal protein G[J]. Protein Sci, 2000, 9(6):1177-1193.[13] BARCHI JR J J, GRASBERGER B, GRONENBORN A M, et al. Investigation of the backbone dynamics of the IgG-binding domain of streptococcal protein G by heteronuclear two-dimensional <sup>1</sup>H-<sup>15</sup>N nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy[J]. Protein Sci, 1994, 3(1):15-21.[14] TUNNICLIFFE R B, WABY J L, WILLIAMS R J, et al. An experimental investigation of conformational fluctuations in proteins G and L[J]. Structure, 2005, 13(11):1677-1684.[15] JEE J, BYEON I J, LOUIS J M, et al. The point mutation A34F causes dimerization of GB1[J]. Proteins, 2008, 71(3):1420-1431.[16] MCCALLISTER E L, ALM E, BAKER D. Critical role of beta-hairpin formation in protein G folding[J]. Nat Struct Biol, 2000, 7(8):669-673.[17] KARANICOLAS J, BROOKS C L. The origins of asymmetry in the folding transition states of protein L and protein G[J]. Protein Sci, 2002, 11(10):2351-2361.[18] WILTON D J, TUNNICLIFFE R B, KAMATARI Y O, et al. Pressure-induced changes in the solution structure of the GB1 domain of protein G[J]. Proteins, 2008, 71(3):1432-1440.[19] GRONENBORN A M, FILPULA D R, ESSIG N Z, et al. A novel, highly stable fold of the immunoglobulin binding domain of streptococcal protein-G[J]. Science, 1991, 253(5020):657-661.[20] THORDARSON P. Determining association constants from titration experiments in supramolecular chemistry[J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2011, 40(3):1305-1323.[21] GRZESIEK S, BAX A, CLORE G M, et al. The solution structure of HIV-1 Nef reveals an unexpected fold and permits delineation of the binding surface for the SH3 domain of Hck tyrosine protein kinase[J]. Nat Struct Biol, 1996, 3(4):340-345.[22] CHEEVER M L, SATO T K, DE BEER T, et al. Phox domain interaction with PtdIns(3)P targets the Vam7 t-SNARE to vacuole membranes[J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2001, 3(7):613-618.[23] FISHER R D, WANG B, ALAM S L, et al. Structure and ubiquitin binding of the ubiquitin-interacting motif[J]. J Biol Chem, 2003, 278(31):28976-82894.[24] OTTING G. Protein NMR using paramagnetic ions[J]. Annu Rev Biophys, 2010, 39:387-405.[25] KUSZEWSKI J, GRONENBORN A M, CLORE G M. Improving the packing and accuracy of NMR structures with a pseudopotential for the radius of gyration[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 1999, 121(10):2337-2338.[26] SCHMITZ C, STANTON-COOK M J, SU X C, et al. Numbat:an interactive software tool for fitting Delta chi-tensors to molecular coordinates using pseudocontact shifts[J]. J Biomol NMR, 2008, 41(3):179-189.[27] WILLIAMS R J P. Chemical selection of elements by cells[J]. Coordin Chem Rev, 2001, 216, 217:583-595.
文章导航

/