研究论文

回波间隔对核磁共振表观孔隙度的影响及矫正方法

  • 张宫 ,
  • 何宗斌 ,
  • 曹文倩 ,
  • 陈瑶
展开
  • 长江大学, 油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430100

收稿日期: 2019-07-22

  网络出版日期: 2019-08-26

基金资助

湖北省教育厅科研计划科学技术研究项目(Q20181320);油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室(长江大学)开放基金资助项目(K2018-17).

Effects of Echo Time on NMR Apparent Porosity and Correction Methods

  • ZHANG Gong ,
  • HE Zong-bin ,
  • CAO Wen-qian ,
  • CHEN Yao
Expand
  • Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources of Education Ministry of Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China

Received date: 2019-07-22

  Online published: 2019-08-26

摘要

本文对具有特定横向弛豫时间(T2)的硫酸铜溶液进行了多回波间隔(TE)的核磁共振(NMR)实验,并利用数值模拟对32组具有不同弛豫分量的模型进行了变TE模拟实验,定量研究了TE对致密油气、页岩气等低孔低渗储层NMR孔隙度的影响规律.实验结果表明,随着TE的增大,各T2弛豫组分NMR孔隙度先维持在100%左右,然后迅速衰减,当TE增加到一定数值时,趋近于0;不同T2弛豫组分NMR孔隙度开始迅速衰减及最后变为0的TE值存在显著差异.根据不同T2弛豫组分NMR孔隙度与TE的关系,将整个NMR测量分为无损测量区、快速衰减区、无效参数区和仪器盲区4个区域.对特定弛豫组分而言,在快速衰减区弛豫组分损失量与TE呈对数关系,本文还给出了该区域NMR孔隙度的校正公式及方法.

本文引用格式

张宫 , 何宗斌 , 曹文倩 , 陈瑶 . 回波间隔对核磁共振表观孔隙度的影响及矫正方法[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2020 , 37(2) : 172 -181 . DOI: 10.11938/cjmr20192771

Abstract

In order to study the effect of echo time (TE) on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) porosity in tight oil (gas) and shale reservoir, multi-TE NMR experiments and NMR numerical simulations were performed on CuSO4 solutions with specific transversal relaxation time (T2). The results showed that the normalization NMR porosity of different T2 relaxation components remained 100% in the low TE region, and rapidly decreased with increasing TE. When TE was greater than certain value, the normalization NMR porosity dropped to zero. However, the TE value at which the normalization NMR porosity began to decrease and the TE value at which the normalization NMR porosity dropped to zero were different for different NMR relaxation component. Moreover, the whole NMR measurement was divided into lossless zone, fast decay zone, invalid parameter zone and instrument blind zone, based on the relationships between the normalization NMR porosity of different relaxation component and TE. For each specific relaxation component, a logarithmic relationship was demonstrated between the loss of relaxation component and TE in the fast decay zone. A method for NMR porosity correction was given.

参考文献

[1] PRAMMER M G, DRACK E D, BOUTON J C, et al. Measurements of clay-bound water and total porosity by magnetic resonance logging[C]. Colorado:SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Geology, 1996:311-320.
[2] WANG W M, YE C H, GUO H K. Experimental studies of NMR properties of continental sedimentary rocks[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2001, 18(2):113-121.王为民, 叶朝辉, 郭和坤. 陆相储层岩石核磁共振物理特征的实验研究[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2001, 18(2):113-121.
[3] WANG Z D, WANG H, LI N G, et al. Analysis of core NMR data from laboratory measurements[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2001, 25(3):170-174.王忠东, 汪浩, 李能根, 等. 核磁共振岩心基础实验分析[J]. 测井技术, 2001, 25(3):170-174.
[4] FAN Y R, NI Z G, DENG S G, et al. Experimental study on NMR measurement parameters and reservoir properties[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2005, 27(6):624-626.范宜仁, 倪自高, 邓少贵, 等. 储层性质与核磁共振测量参数的实验研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2005, 27(6):624-626.
[5] YAN W C, SUN J M, SUN Y, et al. A robust NMR method to measure porosity of low porosity rocks[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2018, 269:113-117
[6] GAO M Z, ZOU C C, PENG C, et al. Study on selection method of core nuclear magnetic experiment parameters for shale reservoir[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2016, 13(3):263-270.高明哲, 邹长春, 彭诚, 等. 页岩储层岩心核磁共振实验参数选取方法研究[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2016, 13(3):263-270.
[7] SUN J M, ZONG C L, DONG X, et al. Porosity measurement of crushed shales using NMR[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2017, 41(5):512-516.孙建孟, 宗成林, 董旭, 等. 基于核磁共振的页岩粉碎样品孔隙度研究[J]. 测井技术, 2017, 41(5):512-516.
[8] ZHANG T, ZHANG X W. Comparative study on qualitative and quantitative methods for shale pore characterization[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2017, 40(4):34-43.张涛, 张希巍. 页岩孔隙定性与定量方法的对比研究[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2017, 40(4):34-43.
[9] SONDERGELD C, TINNI A, RAI C, et al. NMR considerations in shale evaluation[C]//Spwla-2016-rrr,[S.l.]:Society of Petrophysicists and Well-log Analysts, 2016:9.
[10] CHAKRAVARTY A, TINNI A, RAIC C S, et al. NMR considerations in shales at elevated temperature[C]. Texas:SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. Houston, 2018.
[11] WANG Z Z, LI X, WEI Y X, et al. NMR technologies for evaluating oil & gas shale:a review[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2015, 32(4):688-698.王志战, 李新, 魏杨旭, 等. 页岩油气层核磁共振评价技术综述[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2015, 32(4):688-698.
[12] XIE R H, XIAO L Z, LIU J J, et al. A method for multiple echo trains jointing inversion of NMR relaxing measurements[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2009, 52(11):2913-2919.谢然红, 肖立志, 刘家军, 等. 核磁共振多回波串联合反演方法[J]. 地球物理学报, 2009, 52(11):2913-2919.
[13] JIANG R Z, YAO Y P, MIAO S, et al. Improved algorithm for singular value decomposition inversion of T2 spectrum in nuclear magnetic resonance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2005, 26(6):57-59.姜瑞忠, 姚彦平, 苗盛, 等. 核磁共振T2谱奇异值分解反演改进算法[J]. 石油学报, 2005, 26(6):57-59.
[14] ZHANG S M, ZHANG S N, GE X, et al. Optimal design and application of two-dimensional NMR logging in Chuanxi tight gas reservoir[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2018, 35(2):234-242.张世懋, 张哨楠, 葛祥, 等. 川西致密气藏二维核磁共振测井优化设计与应用[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2018, 35(2):234-242.
文章导航

/