Applications of Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Methanol-to-Olefins Reaction

  • Shu-shu GAO ,
  • Shu-tao XU ,
  • Ying-xu WEI ,
  • Zhong-min LIU
Expand
  • 1. National Engineering Laboratory for Methanol to Olefins, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China
    2. Sinopec Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Industry, Beijing 100013, China

Received date: 2021-07-21

  Online published: 2021-09-14

Abstract

Methanol-to-olefins (MTO) is a prevalent industrial process for producing light olefins from the non-petroleum route. Molecular sieves are core catalysts for MTO owing to their unique pore structure and tunable acidity. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is a powerful tool to elucidate the structure and interpret the catalytic reaction mechanism of the molecular sieves. In this review, we summarize the major progresses in understanding the MTO reaction mechanism with in-situ solid-state NMR, multi-dimensional and -nuclear NMR, 129Xe NMR, and pulsed field gradient NMR (PFG NMR). In-situ solid-state NMR can monitor the dynamic changes of the reactants, intermediates and products under real reaction conditions. Multi-dimensional and multi-nuclear NMR offers rich structural information of the reaction intermediate without having to destroy the catalyst structure. Especially, 129Xe NMR is applied to sensitively probe the pore structure of fresh and deactivated catalysts. PFG NMR could determine the diffusion coefficients of molecules in pores, and elucidate the diffusion mechanism of the molecular sieve.

Cite this article

Shu-shu GAO , Shu-tao XU , Ying-xu WEI , Zhong-min LIU . Applications of Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Methanol-to-Olefins Reaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 2021 , 38(4) : 433 -447 . DOI: 10.11938/cjmr20212938

References

1 CHANG C D , SILVESTRI A J . The conversion of methanol and other O-compounds to hydrocarbons over zeolite catalysts[J]. J Catal, 1977, 47 (2): 249- 259.
2 TIAN P , WEI Y X , YE M , et al. Methanol to olefins (MTO): From fundamentals to commercialization[J]. ACS Catal, 2015, 5 (3): 1922- 1938.
3 DUSSELIER M , DAVIS M E . Small-pore zeolites: Synthesis and catalysis[J]. Chem Rev, 2018, 118 (11): 5265- 5329.
4 MOLINER M , MARTíNEZ C , CORMA A . Synthesis strategies for preparing useful small pore zeolites and zeotypes for gas separations and catalysis[J]. Chem Mater, 2014, 26 (1): 246- 258.
5 XU S T , ZHENG A M , WEI Y X , et al. Direct observation of cyclic carbenium ions and their role in the catalytic cycle of the methanol-to-olefin reaction over chabazite zeolites[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2013, 52 (44): 11564- 11568.
6 XU J , WANG Q , DENG F . Metal active sites and their catalytic functions in zeolites: Insights from solid-state NMR spectroscopy[J]. Acc Chem Res, 2019, 52 (8): 2179- 2189.
7 ZHANG W P , XU S T , HAN X W , et al. In situ solid-state NMR for heterogeneous catalysis: a joint experimental and theoretical approach[J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2012, 41 (1): 192- 210.
8 YI X F , LIU K Y , CHEN W , et al. Origin and structural characteristics of tri-coordinated extra-framework aluminum species in dealuminated zeolites[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2018, 140 (34): 10764- 10774.
9 LIN Z Y , HUO H , WANG Q H , et al. Progress in solid-state NMR studies of monoclinic lithium vanadium phosphate[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2020, 37 (1): 16- 27.
9 林泽羽, 霍华, 王启航, 等. 固体核磁共振研究单斜磷酸钒锂的进展[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2020, 37 (1): 16- 27.
10 GAO X Z , ZHANG Y , WANG X M , et al. Structure and acidity changes in ultra-stable Y zeolites during hydrothermal aging: A solid-state NMR spectroscopy study NMR[J]. Chinese J Magn Reson, 2020, 37 (1): 95- 103.
10 高秀枝, 张翊, 王秀梅, 等. 研究超稳Y分子筛水热老化过程中结构与酸性的变化[J]. 波谱学杂志, 2020, 37 (1): 95- 103.
11 CHEN N Y , REAGAN W J . Evidence of autocatalysis in methanol to hydrocarbon reactions over zeolite catalysts[J]. J Catal, 1979, 59 (1): 123- 129.
12 ONO Y , MORI T . Mechanism of methanol conversion into hydrocarbons over ZSM-5 zeolite[J]. J Chem Soc, Faraday Transactions 1, 1981, 77 (9): 2209- 2221.
13 DAHL I M , KOLBOE S . On the reaction mechanism for hydrocarbon formation from methanol over SAPO-34:2. Isotopic labeling studies of the co-reaction of propene and methanol[J]. J Catal, 1996, 161 (1): 304- 309.
14 MOLE T , WHITESIDE J A , SEDDON D . Aromatic co-catalysis of methanol conversion over zeolite catalysts[J]. J Catal, 1983, 82 (2): 261- 266.
15 GUISNET M , COSTA L , RIBEIRO F R . Prevention of zeolite deactivation by coking[J]. J Mol Catal A: Chem, 2009, 305 (1-2): 69- 83.
16 OLSBYE U , SVELLE S , BJ?RGEN M , et al. Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: how zeolite cavity and pore size controls product selectivity[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2012, 51 (24): 5810- 5831.
17 ST?CKER M . Methanol-to-hydrocarbons: catalytic materials and their behavior[J]. Micropor Mesopor Mat, 1999, 29 (1-2): 3- 48.
18 MARCUS D M , MCLACHLAN K A , WILDMAN M A , et al. Experimental evidence from H/D exchange studies for the failure of direct C-C coupling mechanisms in the methanol-to-olefin process catalyzed by HSAPO-34[J]. Angew Chem, 2006, 118 (19): 3205- 3208.
19 LESTHAEGHE D , VAN SPEYBROECK V , MARIN G B , et al. Understanding the failure of direct C-C Coupling in the zeolite-catalyzed methanol-to-olefin process[J]. Angew Chem, 2006, 118 (11): 1746- 1751.
20 DESSAU R M , LAPIERRE R B . On the mechanism of methanol conversion to hydrocarbons over HZSM-5[J]. J Catal, 1982, 78 (1): 136- 141.
21 DAHL I M , KOLBOE S . On the reaction mechanism for hydrocarbon formation from methanol over SAPO-34:I. Isotopic labeling studies of the co-reaction of ethene and methanol[J]. J Catal, 1994, 149 (2): 458- 464.
22 WANG C , YI X F , XU J , et al. Experimental evidence on the formation of ethene through carbocations in methanol conversion over H-ZSM-5 zeolite[J]. Chem A Eur J, 2015, 21 (34): 12061- 12068.
23 ROJO-GAMA D , SIGNORILE M , BONINO F , et al. Structure-deactivation relationships in zeolites during the methanol-to-hydrocarbons reaction: Complementary assessments of the coke content[J]. J Catal, 2017, 35133-48.
24 MORES D , STAVITSKI E , KOX M H F , et al. Space- and time-resolved in-situ spectroscopy on the coke formation in molecular sieves: methanol-to-olefin conversion over H-ZSM-5 and H-SAPO-34[J]. Chem A Eur J, 2008, 14 (36): 11320- 11327.
25 GAO S S , XU S T , WEI Y X , et al. Insight into the deactivation mode of methanol-to-olefins conversion over SAPO-34:Coke, diffusion, and acidic site accessibility[J]. J Catal, 2018, 367, 306- 314.
26 WU X Q , CHEN W , XU S T , et al. Dynamic activation of C1 molecules evoked by zeolite catalysis[J]. ACS Cent Sci, 2021, 7 (4): 681- 687.
27 WANG S , CHEN Y Y , QIN Z F , et al. Origin and evolution of the initial hydrocarbon pool intermediates in the transition period for the conversion of methanol to olefins over H-ZSM-5 zeolite[J]. J Catal, 2019, 369, 382- 395.
28 WU X Q , XU S T , WEI Y X , et al. Evolution of C-C bond formation in the methanol-to-olefins process: From direct coupling to autocatalysis[J]. ACS Catal, 2018, 8 (8): 7356- 7361.
29 CHOWDHURY A D , HOUBEN K , WHITING G T , et al. Initial carbon-carbon bond formation during the early stages of the methanol-to-olefin process proven by zeolite-trapped acetate and methyl acetate[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2016, 55 (51): 15840- 15845.
30 LIU Y , MüLLER S , BERGER D , et al. Formation mechanism of the first carbon-carbon bond and the first olefin in the methanol conversion into hydrocarbons[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2016, 55 (19): 5723- 5726.
31 WANG W , BUCHHOLZ A , SEILER M , et al. Evidence for an initiation of the methanol-to-olefin process by reactive surface methoxy groups on acidic zeolite catalysts[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2003, 125 (49): 15260- 15267.
32 WANG W , HUNGER M . Reactivity of surface alkoxy species on acidic zeolite catalysts[J]. Acc Chem Res, 2008, 41 (8): 895- 904.
33 JIANG Y J , HUNGER M , WANG W . On the reactivity of surface methoxy species in acidic zeolites[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2006, 128 (35): 11679- 11692.
34 JIANG Y J , WANG W , REDDY MARTHALA V R , et al. Effect of organic impurities on the hydrocarbon formation via the decomposition of surface methoxy groups on acidic zeolite catalysts[J]. J Catal, 2006, 238 (1): 21- 27.
35 LI J F , WEI Z H , CHEN Y Y , et al. A route to form initial hydrocarbon pool species in methanol conversion to olefins over zeolites[J]. J Catal, 2014, 317, 277- 283.
36 WANG C , CHU Y Y , XU J , et al. Extra-framework aluminum-assisted initial C-C bond formation in methanol-to-olefins conversion on zeolite H-ZSM-5[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57 (32): 10197- 10201.
37 YANG L , YAN T T , WANG C M , et al. Role of acetaldehyde in the roadmap from initial carbon-carbon bonds to hydrocarbons during methanol conversion[J]. ACS Catal, 2019, 9 (7): 6491- 6501.
38 WU X Q , XU S T , ZHANG W N , et al. Direct mechanism of the first carbon-carbon bond formation in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2017, 56 (31): 9039- 9043.
39 SUN T T , CHEN W , XU S T , et al. The first carbon-carbon bond formation mechanism in methanol-to-hydrocarbons process over chabazite zeolite[J]. Chem, 2021, 7 (9): 2415- 2428.
40 YARULINA I , CHOWDHURY A D , MEIRER F , et al. Recent trends and fundamental insights in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process[J]. Nat Catal, 2018, 1 (6): 398- 411.
41 HAW J F , SONG W G , MARCUS D M , et al. The mechanism of methanol to hydrocarbon catalysis[J]. Acc Chem Res, 2003, 36 (5): 317- 326.
42 ILIAS S , BHAN A . Mechanism of the catalytic conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons[J]. ACS Catal, 2013, 3 (1): 18- 31.
43 BJ?RGEN M , SVELLE S , JOENSEN F , et al. Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons over zeolite H-ZSM-5:On the origin of the olefinic species[J]. J Catal, 2007, 249 (2): 195- 207.
44 ARSTAD B , NICHOLAS J B , HAW J F . Theoretical study of the methylbenzene side-chain hydrocarbon pool mechanism in methanol to olefin catalysis[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2004, 126 (9): 2991- 3001.
45 SONG W G , HAW J F , NICHOLAS J B , et al. Methylbenzenes are the organic reaction centers for methanol-to-olefin catalysis on HSAPO-34[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2000, 122 (43): 10726- 10727.
46 MCCANN D M , LESTHAEGHE D , KLETNIEKS P W , et al. A complete catalytic cycle for supramolecular methanol-to-olefins conversion by linking theory with experiment[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2008, 47 (28): 5179- 5182.
47 ZHANG W N , ZHANG M Z , XU S T , et al. Methylcyclopentenyl cations linking initial stage and highly efficient stage in methanol-to-hydrocarbon process[J]. ACS Catal, 2020, 10 (8): 4510- 4516.
48 XIAO D , XU S T , BROWNBILL N J , et al. Fast detection and structural identification of carbocations on zeolites by dynamic nuclear polarization enhanced solid-state NMR[J]. Chem Sci, 2018, 9 (43): 8184- 8193.
49 ZHANG M Z , XU S T , LI J Z , et al. Methanol to hydrocarbons reaction over Hβ zeolites studied by high resolution solid-state NMR spectroscopy: Carbenium ions formation and reaction mechanism[J]. J Catal, 2016, 335, 47- 57.
50 OLSBYE U , SVELLE S , LILLERUD K P , et al. The formation and degradation of active species during methanol conversion over protonated zeotype catalysts[J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2015, 44 (20): 7155- 7176.
51 SONG W , MARCUS D M , FU H , et al. An oft-studied reaction that may never have been: ? Direct catalytic conversion of methanol or dimethyl ether to hydrocarbons on the solid acids HZSM-5 or HSAPO-34[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2002, 124 (15): 3844- 3845.
52 MINOVA I B , MATAM S K , GREENAWAY A , et al. Elementary steps in the formation of hydrocarbons from surface methoxy groups in HZSM-5 seen by synchrotron infrared microspectroscopy[J]. ACS Catal, 2019, 9 (7): 6564- 6570.
53 HUNGER M . In situ NMR spectroscopy in heterogeneous catalysis[J]. Catal Today, 2004, 97 (1): 3- 12.
54 HAW J F , GOGUEN P W , XU T , et al. In situ NMR investigations of heterogeneous catalysis with samples prepared under standard reaction conditions[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 1998, 37 (7): 948- 949.
55 LI J Z , WEI Y X , CHEN J , et al. Observation of heptamethylbenzenium cation over SAPO-type molecular sieve DNL-6 under real MTO conversion conditions[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2012, 134 (2): 836- 839.
56 WANG J B , WEI Y X , LI J Z , et al. Direct observation of methylcyclopentenyl cations (MCP+) and olefin generation in methanol conversion over TON zeolite[J]. Catal Sci Technol, 2016, 6 (1): 89- 97.
57 CHEN J R , LI J Z , YUAN C Y , et al. Elucidating the olefin formation mechanism in the methanol to olefin reaction over AlPO-18 and SAPO-18[J]. Catal Sci Technol, 2014, 4 (9): 3268- 3277.
58 LI J Z , WEI Y X , CHEN J R , et al. Cavity controls the selectivity: Insights of confinement effects on MTO reaction[J]. ACS Catal, 2015, 5 (2): 661- 665.
59 ZHANG M , XU S T , WEI Y X , et al. Methanol conversion on ZSM-22, ZSM-35 and ZSM-5 zeolites: effects of 10-membered ring zeolite structures on methylcyclopentenyl cations and dual cycle mechanism[J]. RSC Adv, 2016, 6 (98): 95855- 95864.
60 ZHANG W N , CHEN J R , XU S T , et al. Methanol to olefins reaction over cavity-type zeolite: Cavity controls the critical intermediates and product selectivity[J]. ACS Catal, 2018, 8 (12): 10950- 10963.
61 ZHANG W N , XU S T , ZHI Y C , et al. Methylcyclopentenyl cation mediated reaction route in methanol-to-olefins reaction over H-RUB-50 with small cavity[J]. J Energy Chem, 2020, 4525- 30.
62 XIAO D , XU S T , HAN X W , et al. Direct structural identification of carbenium ions and investigation of host-guest interaction in the methanol to olefins reaction obtained by multinuclear NMR correlations[J]. Chem Sci, 2017, 8 (12): 8309- 8314.
63 NI Q Z , DAVISO E , CAN T V , et al. High frequency dynamic nuclear polarization[J]. Acc Chem Res, 2013, 46 (9): 1933- 1941.
64 LESAGE A , LELLI M , GAJAN D , et al. Surface enhanced NMR spectroscopy by dynamic nuclear polarization[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132 (44): 15459- 15461.
65 XIAO J R , WEI J . Diffusion mechanism of hydrocarbons in zeolites-Ⅱ. Analysis of experimental observations[J]. Chem Eng Sci, 1992, 47 (5): 1143- 1159.
66 SMIT B , MAESEN T L M . Towards a molecular understanding of shape selectivity[J]. Nature, 2008, 451 (7179): 671- 678.
67 ZHOU J , FAN W , WANG Y D , et al. The essential mass transfer step in hierarchical/nano zeolite: surface diffusion[J]. Natl Sci Rev, 2019, 7 (11): 1630- 1632.
68 GAO S S , LIU Z Q , XU S T , et al. Cavity-controlled diffusion in 8-membered ring molecular sieve catalysts for shape selective strategy[J]. J Catal, 2019, 37751-62.
69 ZENG S , XU S T , GAO S S , et al. Differentiating diffusivity in different channels of ZSM-5 zeolite by pulsed field gradient (PFG) NMR[J]. ChemCatChem, 2020, 12 (2): 463- 468.
70 HAN J F , LIU Z Q , LI H , et al. Simultaneous evaluation of reaction and diffusion over molecular sieves for shape-selective catalysis[J]. ACS Catal, 2020, 10 (15): 8727- 8735.
71 PENG S C , GAO M B , LI H , et al. Control of surface barriers in mass transfer to modulate methanol-to-olefins reaction over SAPO-34 zeolites[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2020, 59 (49): 21945- 21948.
72 DAI W L , SCHEIBE M , LI L D , et al. Effect of the methanol-to-olefin conversion on the PFG NMR self-diffusivities of ethane and ethene in large-crystalline SAPO-34[J]. J Phys Chem C, 2012, 116 (3): 2469- 2476.
73 CNUDDE P , REDEKOP E A , DAI W , et al. Experimental and theoretical evidence for the promotional effect of acid sites on the diffusion of alkenes through small-pore zeolites[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2021, 60 (18): 10016- 10022.
74 K?RGER J . Transport Phenomena in Nanoporous Materials[J]. ChemPhysChem, 2015, 16 (1): 24- 51.
75 K?RGER J , VALIULLIN R . Mass transfer in mesoporous materials: the benefit of microscopic diffusion measurement[J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2013, 42 (9): 4172- 4197.
76 SMIT B , MAESEN T L M . Molecular simulations of zeolites: Adsorption, diffusion, and shape selectivity[J]. Chem Rev, 2008, 108 (10): 4125- 4184.
77 BUURMANS I L C , WECKHUYSEN B M . Heterogeneities of individual catalyst particles in space and time as monitored by spectroscopy[J]. Nat Chem, 2012, 4 (11): 873- 886.
78 LOSCH P , PINAR A B , WILLINGER M G , et al. H-ZSM-5 zeolite model crystals: Structure-diffusion-activity relationship in methanol-to-olefins catalysis[J]. J Catal, 2017, 34511-23.
79 SHEN Y F , LE T T , FU D L , et al. Deconvoluting the competing effects of zeolite framework topology and diffusion path length on methanol to hydrocarbons reaction[J]. ACS Catal, 2018, 8 (12): 11042- 11053.
80 SPRINGUEL-HUET M A , BONARDET J L , GéDéON A , et al. 129Xe NMR overview of xenon physisorbed in porous solids[J]. Magn Reson Chem, 1999, 37 (13): S1- S13.
81 WEILAND E , SPRINGUEL-HUET M A , NOSSOV A , et al. 129Xenon NMR: Review of recent insights into porous materials[J]. Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 2016, 225 (1): 41- 65.
82 GAO S S , XU S T , WEI Y X , et al. Direct probing of heterogeneity for adsorption and diffusion within a SAPO-34 crystal[J]. Chem Commun, 2019, 55 (72): 10693- 10696.
83 GAO S S , YUAN J M , LIU Z Q , et al. Correlating the adsorption preference and mass transfer of xenon in RHO-type molecular sieves[J]. J Phys Chem C, 2021, 125 (12): 6832- 6838.
84 LOU C Y , ZHANG W N , MA C , et al. Revealing the specific spatial confinement in 8-membered ring cage-type molecular sieves via solid-state NMR and theoretical calculations[J]. ChemCatChem, 2021, 13 (5): 1299- 1305.
85 ANDERSON M W , KLINOWSKI J . Direct observation of shape selectivity in zeolite ZSM-5 by magic-angle-spinning NMR[J]. Nature, 1989, 339 (6221): 200- 203.
86 WEI Y X , YUAN C Y , LI J Z , et al. Coke formation and carbon atom economy of methanol-to-olefins reaction[J]. ChemSusChem, 2012, 5 (5): 906- 912.
Outlines

/